Skip to main content

MVVM and MVP pattern(s) as applicable to SilverLight


There could be more to these design patterns and its applicability in SilverLight, however this article is only intended to present and overview and high-level understanding of how to get started in SilverLight application patterns.

SilverLight implements SOLID design guidelines along with a MVVM or MVP design pattern.
Figure shown below  depicts the comparison of approaches followed in MVVM and MVP pattern.




MVVM pattern can follow two approaches

1.       View First: The view is responsible for creating an instance of a ViewModel, via databinding to a static resource or setting the data context in the code-behind file.
  • Databinding approach

UserControl.Resources
local:SampleViewModel x:Key=”ViewModel” /
UserControl.Resources
                Grid DataContext=”{Binding Path=Object,
Grid is bound to object that is obviously in Model.


  • Code Behind approach
 this.DataContext = new SampleViewModel();

2.       View-Model first: The ViewModel creates an instance of the view and sets its data context.
This is usually done using an Inversion of Control Container like MEF, PRISM etc.
(This  article is only an exploration of design patterns in use in silverlight)
Both these approaches have their own pros and cons that I am not going to discuss here. For the time it’s your decision based on requirement as to which approach you want to follow.

Event Broker Pattern:
The normal way to use an event is for one class to subscribe to the events of another class. This approach works great when each class has direct access to the other and only one class can trigger an event. 

However, in more advanced scenarios one or more classes may need to send the same event or be notified by events without subscribing directly to the caller event.

Events can be treated as another type of dependency and instead of subscribing directly to an event, a container (Event Broker) could be used to manage the subscribers and publishers of an event. This is  exactly what is done in IOC /Dependency injection .
When an event occurs, the Event Broker would be responsible for notifying all subscribers that an event occurred.

Let’s consider a practical example of  handling the closing of an application.
Normal Scenario:  The application needs to loop through each control on the screen to check to see if its needs to be saved before applications closes.
Event Broker Pattern Scenario:
Event Broker handles notification to each control, to save itself. Isn’t his a better approach.

Hope this was helpful.

Till Next we connect……

Happy reading……

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Authentication using Social Networking portals(Facebook, Gmail, and Yahoo)

There are tons of sites, which offer sign on using the social networking site credentials (Facebook, gtalk, twitter and the list continues).It can be termed a “SINGLE SIGNON” and offers a lot of benefits compared to traditional database authentication approach. However, not storing user credentials in the DB imposes an additional risk. How to track who all logged into the system. Now the question is, which approach to follow. The best approach is to use inbuilt asp.net users for storing the logging info about user activities and using single signon technique for authentication. This article will explore the approach and provide the details of implementation using some third party libraries and customizing it to the requirements. The Authentication will be done using the following networking portals Yahoo  Gmail Facebook    Special thanks to my friend Sumit Khandelwal, for implementation of Facebook part (in fact he did it all!!) Except Facebook, all other ca...

HTML-5 Let's get started

Want to see html 5 in action, before actually diving into it, here's your chance. Go to this LINK and see the wonderful features that HTML-5 has to offer. Feeling overwhelmed, feel like getting hands dirty with this new kid on the block? Here's how to get started Hope this was useful.... Till next we connect.... Happy reading.....